Commitment is becoming an issue for
people. We’ve been raised by the ideal that commitment is something of value.
It’s something that’s founded the basis of the American family. People in their
lives have commitment in order to maintain their lives and the roles that they
play. Someone can only hold onto their lifestyle if it’s solidified in
commitment. It’s a factor that multiplies the exponential force of stability.
A stable lifestyle is the goal of
the average American. It’s something that everyone wants. That’s what we’ve all
been raised to believe. But somehow, people are starting to break away from the
norm. They’re starting to rebel against the things they’ve been taught and try
new things out.
It’s a good idea to support experimentation
if this type of thing is becoming a trend. Seeing as how people are going to be
going all over the place with new ideas that have had limited exposure at this
point, there has to be some room for people to breathe and forgive others when
mistakes are made.
The lifestyle of an experimentalist
is very scientific. It comes with its factors, and those factors lead to
deductions about wins and losses. Scientists are known to be the type of people
who watch things go by the wayside all the time. Throwing one idea in and other
idea out by proving that one works and another doesn’t.
Social experimentation can be very
romantic at times. You could be with one person at one point in time, and then
cheat on them for some reason, and then you’re left with the impression that
your commitment is lacking on one end. Like it’s more about how much action you’re
getting than how much one person matters to you. That’s what it’s like lacking
commitment, it’s an emotional ditch that you’re digging for people. Kind of
like a television show.
Televised commitment is somewhat of
a viewership issue. Romantic commitment is measured in time. That’s not to say
that watching television isn’t romantic. There are all kinds of scenes that
feature romance between a man and a woman. But there’s room for that to expand
all across the board. There could be entire shows dedicated to romantic
escapades, or even romances between gays to highlight newer forms of romance.
The issue with gay rights is that it’s
edgy. There’s a lot of opponents to the movement. It goes against traditional
values. Not in the sense of passion, which some do explore naturally, but in
the sense that when you’re watching it on tv, it’s not the same thing as when
you’re watching a man and a woman for some reason. It has a different kind of
appeal, one that has something different going on. It’s more flamboyant and expressive
of the passions that people have. Maybe leading to the conclusion that those
gay thoughts that float around in some’s minds are either explored by some or
left to the privacy of the mind. For the more passionate gays, there are plenty
of instances where gay people have been very successful in their lives and on
tv. To further the movement, it just takes knowing the right way to approach it,
so that gay people on television aren’t just relegated to a gay audience, but
are coming out into the mainstream as equals.
It’s another matter of commitment.
One where there is a matter of social acceptance for people to push towards
their lifestyles of choice. Letting yourself express yourself and the thoughts
that you have, the passions you have to explore. Commitment to yourself and the
way that you feel about the actions that you commit yourself towards. Letting
yourself experiment around with things and find out what’s right for you.
Comments
Post a Comment
Your Feedback is Welcome!